See what you get
A difference you can actually resolve.
Exact passages, a reason to review them, and a decision for you. Explore these illustrative examples without an account or a charge.
Upcoming launch post
Our support team is available seven days a week.
example.com/support
Our support team is available Monday–Friday.
These passages describe different support schedules.
Are you announcing new hours, or should the draft use the existing schedule?
You get the evidence. You decide what changes.
What happens next?
If the draft is wrong, revise it. If you’re announcing a new policy, make that change explicit and decide which existing pages need an update. Different dates or audiences can explain an apparent conflict.
Real checks include source links, captured text, timestamps, coverage and uncertainty. An incomplete review stays labeled incomplete—even when it finds no conflicts. A result never grants permission to publish.
Controlled check · October 15, 2026
What happened when we checked our own site?
We submitted a synthetic draft claiming SyncWise audits had no page limit and inspected every page. The service found the site’s published 25-page limit and returned source evidence.
- Five HTML pages were captured; three Markdown/text resources were excluded.
- After an adjustment to group related observations, the contradictory draft produced one grouped finding.
- A compatible draft stating the 25-page limit produced no findings, but the review still reported incomplete coverage.
Limits of this test
This demonstrates one controlled catch, not an accuracy benchmark or a customer outcome. Quotes were checked against captured text, but the interpretation still needed review: one recommendation suggested updating our preserved historical demo. That is a scope judgment the owner should correct, not an edit to apply automatically.
A later MCP check, after adding more site content, returned three findings for the no-limit claim. Finding count alone is not a measure of review quality.